Close
Login to MyACC
ACC Members


Not a Member?

The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) is the world's largest organization serving the professional and business interests of attorneys who practice in the legal departments of corporations, associations, nonprofits and other private-sector organizations around the globe.

Join ACC

This Wisdom of the Crowd, compiled from questions and responses posted on the Employment & Labor eGroup,* addresses whether or not an employer can enforce a non-compete provision against an independent contractor, who was treated largely as an employee.
 
*(Permission was received from the ACC members quoted below prior to publishing their eGroup Comments in this Wisdom of the Crowd resource.)
 
Question:
A while ago, my company had a sales person that we paid as an independent contractor even though there is a pretty good argument that we treated him like an employee. Prior to my employment, he signed an employment agreement that included a non-compete provision and a confidentiality provision. In this agreement, he is referred to as an employee. The agreement is under Oklahoma law.
 
He is no longer with the company and we have evidence that he is violating this non-compete and probably the confidentiality provision.
 
Management would like to send a Cease & Desist Letter to him and the company that he is currently working for. Management's argument is that he was a sales person and that this is somehow an exception to the independent contractor (IC) versus employee debate.
 
I am afraid that this will expose us to more liability, as we would then be treating him like an employee - an issue that he hinted at prior to him leaving the company.
 
Wisdom of the Crowd:

Response #1: Let me suggest that you might be focusing on the wrong issue. It seems to me that it makes no practical difference whether he was an employee or an independent contractor for purposes of seeking to enforce the non-compete provision of his contract. It sounds as if he had a valid contract with your company and received adequate consideration in return for his promises including the non-compete.1

Response #2: Win a battle and lose the war? I would want to know two things before pursuing this further: (1) is the non-compete likely to be enforceable? Courts generally do not like them and it would need to meet the various scope restrictions (geography, duration, and activity covered) to have a chance of enforceability without guarantee; and (2) if you sue on the non-compete and he/she countersues alleging misclassification (employee v. independent contractor), what is the likely liability the company will face if you lose that claim? Lost wages / benefits, unpaid taxes? Minimum wage claims? Stock grants that should have been paid? Other? The employee/IC can also file a misclassification claim with Oklahoma authorities who could independently pursue unpaid taxes, wages, etc. Also, ask whether it is the competing that is the issue or whether he/she is misusing confidential and proprietary information? These are separate issues that often get mixed together.2
 
Response #3: Looks like you are stuck between the proverbial rock and a hard place. You will need to weigh the pros of enforcing the non-compete versus the cons of fighting a willful misclassification action. The "employment agreement" is evidence against you on the employment issue if he pushes it in response to a cease and desist action. Unlikely he would raise the issue in response to a letter unless you seek an injunction. However, you might check if there was an independent contractor agreement by which he agreed to indemnify the Company for all taxes etc. On the bright side you would be almost out of luck in California and face stiffer penalties for the misclassification. Regardless of how he is ultimately classified, you are likely to have an enforceable covenant since you are in Oklahoma.3
 
Response #4: You need to look at all agreements before you weigh the pros and cons of the approach. The non-compete will be enforceable in Oklahoma; you need to decide if it is worth it.4
 
Response #5: I am not aware of any exception for a "sales person" on the analysis of an independent contractor v. employee.
 
I agree with you that you may face an increased risk of having this individual found to be an employee if you attempt to enforce a non-compete against him.
 
Some states (New York) feel that a non-compete in any agreement with an independent contractor negates their status as an independent contractor.
 
You could certainly prevent him from using Confidential Information in either case (employee v. independent contractor), but I would be very careful with respect to the non-compete.5
 
Response #6: Talk about tangled webs . . . If the "employment agreement" to which you refer is the agreement he had as an Independent Contractor, then you are correct to conclude that trying to enforce a non-compete agreement against him is a 100% sure fire way to concede the point that he was an employee and not a true IC. Now, that may or may not matter much to the company. You may be on the hook for state unemployment contributions, Workers' Compensation contributions, and Federal Insurance Contribution Act taxes for the period of employment, but the former employee might not care much about any of that since he's not getting the money. But, if he would have a claim for severance pay, medical benefits, or other money in his pocket (including minimum wages or overtime claims), then you might not want to go there as he would be much more likely to come after you. You should also be wary of how this case might affect any other Independent Contractor arrangements you may have with other people.
 
But, a company CAN enforce a confidentiality agreement against an Independent Contractor. If he had access to proprietary information and is potentially misusing that information, you can send the cease and desist letter based SOLELY on breach of confidentiality and not mentioning any non-compete. You might have a better shot at that, although getting any actual relief on that kind of claim is not easy. But it may make your CEO happy that you "did something" without exposing the company to a claim from the former IC/employee.6
 
Response #7: I am not an Oklahoma lawyer, but a cursory Google search identified Oklahoma as one of three states (the others being California and North Dakota) that deem non-compete agreements void and unenforceable.7
 
Response #8: We've had some similar issues with our employees. As mentioned, the issue isn't the independent contractor argument, but the non-compete.8
 
Response #9: I would avoid getting into a contract fight altogether if the non-compete and confidentiality agreement suffer from the same flaw - he is referred to as an employee (or the confidentiality provisions are included in the non-compete). Either way, you are inviting a classification dispute and, if there are other sales people who may be misclassified you run a risk of class litigation or a US Department of Labor investigation. Have you considered treating his conduct as a misappropriation of trade secrets under state statute?9
_______________________________
 1James Castagnera, Legal Counsel for Academic Affairs, Rider University, New Jersey (Employment & Labor Law, June 22, 2016).
2Anonymous Poster (June, 2016).
3Anonymous Poster (June, 2016).
4Anonymous Poster (June, 2016).
5Theresa Szuba, Assistant Corporate Counsel, Par Technology Corporation, New York (Employment & Labor Law, June 22, 2016).
6Kevin G. Chapman, Associate General Counsel, Dow Jones & Company, New Jersey (Employment & Labor Law, June 22, 2016).
7Vessela Garvey, General Counsel, CP Global, California (Employment & Labor Law, June 22, 2016).
8Jeffrey Taylor, Corporate Counsel, Duit Holdings, Inc., Oklahoma (Employment & Labor Law, June 23, 2016).
9Mark Colucci, General Counsel, Defenders, Inc., Indiana (Employment & Labor Law, June 23, 2016).
Region: United States
The information in any resource collected in this virtual library should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.
ACC