This article considers the recent trend in cases which involve the extent of the Court’s jurisdiction to a determine a “just and equitable winding up petition” when faced with a valid arbitration agreement between the two parties.
In order to examine the trends, the piece compares and contrasts cases which took place in common law jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands Court of Appeals and the Hong Kong Court of First Instance, as well as the British Virgin Islands.
Authors: James Noble, Partner, Kate Lan, Senior Associate, and Yan Chng, Associate, Carey Olsen
Members-only access
To access the full resource, you must be a member. Already a member? Login to unlock.
Login
Not an ACC member?
Gain access to a comprehensive collection of global resources for in-house counsel
Sign up for a 30-day trial
Region:
British Virgin Isles
,
Hong Kong
The information in any resource collected in this virtual library should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.