ACC Comment letter voicing its perspectives regarding the differences in requirements promulgated by regulatory agencies such as the SEC in the United States and lawmakers in other countries.
ACCA and its CA Chapters' comments to The Judicial Council of California Supreme Court Multijurisdictional Practice Implementation Committee regarding its report: The Multijurisdictional Practice of Law by Lawyers Not Admitted to the State Bar of California.
Copy of the memo from 2006 covering the Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations
California Bar Comment Letter on Proposed Amendments to the
Sentencing Guidelines for the United States Courts (71 FR 4782-4804)
Filed April 11, 2008 to the US Department of Labor by ACC's Employment and Labor Law Committee, this comment letter expresses ACC's
position on the proposed revisions to regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in in Bisaillon v. Concordia University is a welcome reaffirmation of two principles. The first is that the procedural remedy has not changed the substantive law. Thus, if no individual action lies, no collective action lies either. The second principle is that the class representative must have a sufficient personal interest to sustain an action. This paper will examine each of these principles in light of examples drawn from Quebec case law.
A sample letter requesting seller's confidential information to determine valuation of the seller's company in a merger.
A flow chart guiding employers through relevant health and safety regulations.
ACC amicus brief with the Third Circuit in a case involving BCE, Inc., being sued by a number of its former subsidiaries now in bankruptcy, primarily Teleglobe Communications, demanding access to privileged communications.