This program originally aired on October, 12, 2022. Please note that the on-demand format of this program is not eligible for CLE/CPD credit.

In this Webcast, attendees will learn what Hospital at Home Is (spoiler alert: it is an approach to treatment that offers acute-level care to patients in their homes), why it makes sense, why now, and how a hospital at home program can be put in place. Attendees will also learn about the barriers to building a hospital at home program, practical and legal considerations in getting such programs up and running, and what the future of hospital at home looks like. The presenters for this webcast have been involved in the design and implementation of multiple hospital at home programs and will share their insights and answer questions.

Generously sponsored by Foley & Lardner LLP

The COVID-adjacent economy has given rise to surprising developments, including shifting employee priorities. Legal professionals are rethinking the status quo by rejecting working practices, hours, and remuneration that don't align with their personal goals. This session will discuss the Great Resignation, in-house job satisfaction (or dissatisfaction), new work preferences, and the evolving legal talent experience globally.

This on-demand program is not eligible for CLE/CPD credit.

Over the past year we have seen a host of changes in the global privacy landscape, including the newly published Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) changes, which permanently embed the Schrems II decision into data transfer analyses, and the rise of data localization requirements. Join us as we discuss these recent changes and how they impact the negotiation of security clauses and data protection addendums. Panelists will walk through a mock contract negotiation to point out potential pitfalls and solutions to common problems.

Due to the nature of its content, this on-demand program is not eligible for CLE/CPD credit.

This program originally aired on Sept. 9, 2023. Please note that the on-demand format of this program is not eligible for CLE/CPD credit.

In the companion cases Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Univ. of North Carolina, the US Supreme Court recently held that race-based admissions practices in higher education are unconstitutional. Although the decision primarily deals with higher education, it also has potential implications for employers across all industries. Join us for a discussion on what those implications are, what we see for the future of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace and our recommendations for what employers should do to stay on top of this constantly shifting landscape.

Generously sponsored by Jackson Lewis